Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zizou Bergs vs Calvin Hemery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bergs vs Hemery analysis and find out who is favored!
Zizou Bergs vs Calvin Hemery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bergs has won 51.32% of points on his second serve, while Hemery has won 50.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bergs, in recent form, has won 50.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hemery has won 46.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.98% and 31.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bergs has saved 61.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hemery has saved 60.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bergs has won 64.79% of matches played (W/L 46/ 25), with Hemery winning 60% (W/L 45/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 13/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/ 51). Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 184/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 30/ 10), where as Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 34/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bergs winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bergs winning 3 and Hemery winning 3. The last match between Bergs and Hemery was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 20-04-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Zizou Bergs getting the victory 3-6 6-4 4-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:24:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bergs and Hemery have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bergs winning 0 times and Hemery 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bergs winning 0, and Hemery 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bergs has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.07 while Hemery has played against players with an average rank of 270.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bergs has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hemery has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bergs has converted 38.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hemery has converted 36.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bergs 1 - 1 Hemery
108
Rank
103
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
205
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
62% (279-168)
Career Total W/L
58% (362-258)
65% (22-12)
YTD W/L
43% (12-16)
$313,835
Career Prize Money
$181,475
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zizou Bergs | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 25 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:24:28 | 2:24:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (108/171) | 61% (100/164) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (70/108) | 60% (60/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (36/63) | 61% (39/64) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 38% (6/16) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (65/164) | 38% (65/171) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Zizou Bergs
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zizou Bergs | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (22/12) | 43% (12/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (52/32) | 45% (29/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (422/378) | 49% (306/322) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (12/4) | 52% (11/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| Aces Total | 255 | 170 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 103 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:1 | 1:50:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 303.62 | 274.61 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1521/2485) | 62% (1223/1969) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1121/1521) | 70% (855/1223) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (493/964) | 51% (380/746) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (92/245) | 37% (62/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (973/2513) | 37% (738/1997) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 48% (11/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (21/31) | 42% (11/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 82% (9/11) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (25/19) | 79% (14/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (25/6) | 21% (14/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 7% (14/1) |
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Zizou Bergs
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Juncheng Shang
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Patrick Kypson
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
67%
(
26 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Zizou Bergs
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Gerald Melzer
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Zizou Bergs
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Calvin Hemery
61%
(
76 of
124)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
4
Aces
11
11
Double Faults
10
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
117
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Calvin Hemery
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alexander Ritschard
57%
(
76 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
41%
(
54 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Bergs Vs Hemery Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
